Mathematics
0580The gate everything else waits behind.
- Questions
- 1,000
- Criteria
- 2,775
Papers 2, 4 · growing weekly
Submit your exam attempt. Get back every mark you lost and exactly why. Phloem marks your working the way an examiner does — one criterion at a time — not one score for the whole answer.
Seven days free. Plans from $5 a week after. Cancel any week.
The problem
A percentage is a verdict, not a diagnosis. It tells you that something went wrong thirty-six times and refuses to say what.
Every other tool marks your answer right or wrong. You get a tick, a cross, and a number — and none of it tells you whether you lost the mark because you misread the question, because you picked the wrong method, or because you divided 24 by 8 and wrote 4.
Those are three completely different problems. Two of them you fix in an afternoon. One of them you have been repeating since Year 9 and nobody has ever named it.
Phloem shows you the individual marks you dropped and the exact criterion each one failed — because that is the unit a real examiner works in.
Every other app
Phloem
…and every other mark, each named and tied to the mistake behind it.
The engine
A mark scheme is a sequence of independent decisions. Did the candidate choose a valid method? Did they carry it out? Is the value they produced correct, judged against the value they themselves arrived at earlier? Each of those is a separate question with a separate mark attached.
Phloem answers them one at a time, in the order the specification sets out, and records which criterion produced each mark. That is why it can tell you that you lost one accuracy mark and kept two method marks — instead of telling you that you got a question wrong.
No chat window, no open-ended tutoring, no score with a motivational message attached. A marker, and the reasoning it used.
How it works
Photograph your working or type it in. Whole question, workings and all — not just the final answer, because the working is where the marks actually are.
Phloem walks the mark scheme one criterion at a time, deciding each mark on its own evidence. Method marks are judged separately from accuracy marks.
Every mark you earned, every mark you dropped, and the named mistake behind each one — plus another question on the criterion you failed.
Watch it mark
This student got the final answer wrong. Their method was right the whole way through, so the method marks are theirs. Here is the same script, marked the way the exam board marks it.
Mathematics 0580 · Paper 4
Solve the simultaneous equations.
6x + 2y = 28 · 2x − 2y = −4
marks
M1
Adds the two equations to eliminate y
6x + 2y = 28 2x − 2y = −4 —————— 8x = 24
A1
Obtains x = 3
8x = 24 x = 4
M2FT
Substitutes their x into either equation
6(4) + 2y = 28 24 + 2y = 28 2y = 4
A2
Obtains y = 5
2y = 4 y = 2
Marking one criterion at a time…
An M mark pays for choosing and carrying out the right method. It does not care whether the number that came out was right.
Once the slip happens, later criteria are marked against the student's own earlier value — so one mistake costs one mark, not four.
None of this is generous. It is the published behaviour of a Cambridge mark scheme, applied consistently. No other AI tool does it.
Send one question you got wrong. Phloem marks it criterion by criterion and shows you every mark you dropped, and the mistake behind it. No account, no card, no trial to remember to cancel.
No signup required
On purpose
Each mark is decided on its own evidence, in the order the mark scheme sets out. You see the criterion, not a colour.
Slip early and the rest of your working is judged against your own answer. One mistake costs one mark, not the whole question.
M, A and B marks behave the way the published specification says they behave — including which marks depend on which.
Marked in seconds, with the misconception behind each lost mark named and another question on that criterion ready to go.
Topics you stop practising fade, the way they actually do. Phloem resurfaces them before the exam, not after.
No XP, no daily flame. You have an exam date — that's the motivation. Streaks just push people to redo easy topics.
Student plans
Every plan starts with a seven-day free trial. Pick the tier that fits how hard you're going, and cancel any week.
One subject, marked properly.
$5/ week
After the 7-day free trial
Everything you're sitting.
$8/ week
After the 7-day free trial
For the last eight weeks.
$15/ week
After the 7-day free trial
All plans are weekly. Cancel any time — no contracts, no minimum term. Your card is only charged on day eight.
Questions
Who built this
Hi, I’m Alaa Abbadi.
I built Phloem on my own, because every revision app I tried told me what my score was and none of them told me what I had actually done wrong. A percentage is not feedback. The criterion you dropped, and the reason you dropped it, is.
So Phloem marks the way the people marking your real paper do — one criterion at a time, method marks judged separately from accuracy marks, follow-through applied against your own working. No streaks, no XP, no chatbot. You have an exam date; that is motivation enough.
Phloem marks against published Cambridge specification criteria and is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cambridge Assessment International Education. Every question was written for Phloem — no past paper or published mark scheme has been reproduced.
Upload one question you got wrong. Phloem marks it criterion by criterion and names every mark you dropped. Seven days free, then $5 a week if you keep it.
No card for the trial. No contracts. Cancel any week.
Subjects
A Mathematics mark scheme is unambiguous. If Phloem can't mark that at ninety-five percent agreement with a human examiner, nothing else matters — so that's the gate everything else waits behind.
The gate everything else waits behind.
Papers 2, 4 · growing weekly
Working shown, method marks protected.
Papers 2, 4, 6 · growing weekly
Moles, equations and the steps between.
Papers 2, 4, 6 · growing weekly
Command words carry the marks here.
Papers 2, 4, 6 · growing weekly
Pseudocode marked on logic, not style.
Papers 1, 2 · growing weekly
Marked to the band descriptors.
Papers 1, 2, 3 · growing weekly
6,000 questions carrying 14,801 individually markable criteria, across 6 subjects. Every one was written for Phloem against the published specification — no past paper and no published mark scheme has been reproduced. The bank grows weekly.